|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2009-1-6 22:58:04
|
显示全部楼层
Guns of the Patriotss most important accomplishment (plot-wise, at any rate) is the precise manner in which it reframes and clarifies Snake Eaters story. The strand that binds the two games in this particular diptych is the fact that, in each, the real sequence of events is something that transpires in the background, never once referred to in the games forward progression. In Snake Eater we see the foundation of a secret organization, motivated by the desecration of a heros body, then in Guns of the Patriots, its dissolution, also due to the outrage over a dead warriors body being defiled. I wonder, though, how greatly the inability of the player to be a mover and shaker in the plot contributes to the games odd sense of inertia which settles in occasionally.
Metal Gear Solid 4 is built on solid theoretical ground, which is good, because the storys presentation itself is more than a little unsatisfying. My initial reaction to Snake Eater was that although it may have been overly familiar, predictable, and barren, it was still clean, coherent, and compellingly presented, and these can be important virtues in their own right. Guns of the Patriots is often sloppy and muddled, rambling, obfuscatory, unnecessary, and riddled with plot holes. Oddly enough, despite what others may say, this is the first time I think thats ever been true about a game written/directed by Hideo Kojima, his work having always struck me as being noticeably efficient and tightly constructed. Im reserving my grousing on various plot points for the final paragraph, but for now it should be pointed out that the game is prone to the great evil of gigantism, both in its spectacle (when Liquid is taken on the Volta River, count the number of shots of soldiers massing, circling, aiming, etc.) and verbosity (the final conversation in the game has so many pointlessly portentous remarks that it seems like there should be a whole new game to evenly space them out). Two of the most interesting characters of all, Raiden and Ocelot, are brusquely shunted to the side for the durationthe former used as an easy out whenever it seems the narrative is dead-ending, the latter apparently assimilated and destroyed. Other characters seem to appear just for the sake of a roll-call. |
|